In a revealing new documentary aired on Russian state television, President Vladimir Putin made one of his starkest accusations yet against the West. He claimed that Western powers actively sought to provoke Russia into deploying nuclear weapons during its ongoing war in Ukraine.
The statement, made in the Kremlin-sanctioned documentary Russia. Kremlin. Putin. 25 Years, is part of a broader pattern of nuclear rhetoric. The conflict, which has now lasted more than three years, continues to shape Putin’s narrative.
“They wanted to provoke us, they wanted to make us make mistakes,” said Putin in the film, which chronicles his rise and rule over Russia.
However, the longtime leader stressed that Russia saw “no need” to resort to nuclear arms. “And I hope that this will not be necessary in the future either,” he added.
While Putin framed his decision as one of restraint, his government has repeatedly raised the threat of nuclear war. This was especially aimed at NATO and the United States to deter deeper involvement in the conflict. Early in the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, which began in February 2022, Western intelligence agencies feared that Moscow might cross the nuclear threshold. By autumn of 2022, reports indicated that the U.S. government believed the Kremlin could be preparing to deploy a tactical nuclear weapon.
According to The New York Times, Washington responded with a stern, secret diplomatic warning. They emphasized the catastrophic consequences of such an escalation. Although the situation did not escalate into a nuclear exchange, the threat lingered throughout the conflict’s evolution.
A New Front in Dnipro: November 2024 Missile Strike Interpreted as a Signal
The November 2024 launch of a new Russian medium-range missile that struck the Ukrainian city of Dnipro has been widely interpreted as a symbolic nuclear threat. The attack, while non-nuclear in execution, demonstrated Russia’s ability to deliver high-impact strikes at considerable distances. Ukrainian and Western analysts have pointed to the missile’s capabilities and timing as a deliberate signal from the Kremlin.
While no nuclear weapons were used, the nature of the attack intensified global anxiety. It reignited debates in Brussels, Washington, D.C., and London over how to respond should Putin decide to escalate further.
Casualties on the Russian Side: Ukrainian Drone Strikes Kill Three in Kursk
Meanwhile, Russia continues to face consequences of its own on the home front. On Monday, Alexander Khinshtein, the governor of Russia’s Kursk region, confirmed on Telegram, a favored platform among Russian officials, that three civilians were killed in drone attacks blamed on Ukraine.
According to Khinshtein, two women died when a Ukrainian drone struck a car carrying five individuals. One man and two other women survived with injuries. A separate drone attack claimed the life of another man. These incidents mark yet another instance of Ukrainian drone activity deep into Russian territory.
Though Ukraine rarely confirms attacks beyond its borders, these operations align with its goal of creating a “buffer zone” along the Russia-Ukraine border. This strategy has been publicly endorsed by Ukraine’s newly appointed commander-in-chief Oleksandr Syrskyi. Posting on Facebook, Syrskyi claimed that the ongoing border campaign has been largely successful in pushing Russian forces back from critical areas.
“The buffer zone that the Ukrainian defence forces have created in the border areas remains relevant now,” Syrskyi said.
Russian Counter-Operations and Moscow Drone Swarms
As border tensions escalate, so too do Ukrainian long-range drone operations targeting Moscow. Russian officials said on Tuesday that air defence systems intercepted at least 19 Ukrainian drones overnight, just a day after a similar barrage disrupted air traffic around the capital.
Moscow Mayor Sergei Sobyanin confirmed that drones were intercepted “from different directions,” prompting temporary closures at several of the city’s airports. Videos posted on Russian social media showed glowing tracer rounds lighting up the night sky, with loud explosions heard near the outskirts of the capital.
Although no casualties were reported, the symbolic weight of repeated attacks on Russia’s capital is significant. It reflects both Ukraine’s growing drone capabilities and the psychological toll on Russian civilians.
Read More:
- U.S. and Ukraine Finalize Landmark Economic Agreement Amid Ongoing Conflict with Russia
- Seoul Condemns Pyongyang’s Admission as ‘Confession of Criminal Activities’ Amid North Korea’s Troop Deployment to Russia
- Beijing’s Fury Over CK Hutchison’s Panama Canal Port Sale – What’s Next?
Tyotkino Advance: Unconfirmed Reports of Ukrainian Ground Push into Russia
On Monday, Russian military bloggers—many of whom are staunch pro-Kremlin voices—reported a new Ukrainian advance into the Kursk region, near the village of Tyotkino. The claims have not yet been verified by either Moscow or Kyiv, but if confirmed, they would mark a rare instance of Ukrainian ground forces entering Russian territory.
Despite the lack of official confirmation, the reports align with Ukraine’s strategy. The aim is to keep Russian forces off-balance and force the Kremlin to defend multiple fronts.
Three Years of War and Counting
Since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the conflict has devastated large portions of Ukrainian territory. Cities such as Mariupol, Bakhmut, and Severodonetsk have suffered catastrophic destruction. Millions of Ukrainians have been displaced, and tens of thousands have died.
While Russia has also experienced casualties and economic strain, the balance of suffering remains disproportionately skewed toward Ukraine. Entire communities in eastern and southern Ukraine have been reduced to rubble, and reconstruction is projected to cost hundreds of billions of dollars.
Despite this, Ukrainian forces have proven remarkably resilient, continuing to mount effective counter-offensives and innovative drone attacks well into 2025.
Diplomatic Maneuvers: Trump’s Ceasefire Proposal Rejected by Moscow
Amid the fighting, efforts to broker a ceasefire have picked up momentum. Donald Trump, now once again President of the United States, recently floated a proposal for a 30-day unconditional ceasefire between Moscow and Kyiv. According to reports, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky accepted the offer, calling it a welcome reprieve for war-weary civilians.
Putin, however, rejected the proposal outright.
Instead, the Russian president announced a unilateral 72-hour ceasefire to coincide with Victory Day, the annual May 9 celebration marking the end of World War II. The Kremlin hopes the temporary pause will serve as a symbolic gesture of peace and strength, as well as an opportunity for nationalistic pageantry in Red Square.
According to Russian officials, the ceasefire will begin at 12:00 a.m. local time on Thursday and last until 12:00 a.m. on Sunday.
Kyiv Unimpressed: Zelensky Demands Longer Pause
Kyiv has responded coldly to the offer. In a strongly worded Telegram post, President Zelensky accused Moscow of duplicity.
“The Russians are asking for a ceasefire on May 9 and are themselves firing at Ukraine every day. This is cynicism of the highest order,” Zelensky wrote.
Ukraine insists that any ceasefire must last at least 30 days and include internationally monitored mechanisms to prevent violations. Kyiv is also wary of Russia using temporary ceasefires to regroup and resupply, as has allegedly happened in previous pauses.
Putin’s Strategic Messaging: Nuclear Threats as Leverage
Putin’s comments in the documentary highlight a key theme in Russia’s war rhetoric: the use of nuclear threats as deterrence. By claiming that the West tried to provoke a nuclear response, the Kremlin seeks to portray itself as the responsible party. However, this narrative contrasts with Russia’s own repeated nuclear threats, which have raised alarms among NATO members and Western governments. These threats have contributed to growing concerns over the potential for escalation in the ongoing war with Ukraine.
Western analysts see this as part of a psychological campaign meant to dissuade NATO from deeper involvement. Whether this strategy is successful remains to be seen.
High Stakes in a Prolonged War
As the war drags into its fourth year, all sides appear entrenched. Ukraine is pushing for more Western support, both militarily and financially. Russia, under Putin’s increasingly authoritarian rule, shows no signs of relenting. Meanwhile, Western powers remain divided on how to act without escalating the conflict.
With the nuclear threat still looming, and diplomatic channels fraying, the coming months could be crucial. The future of the war depends not only on what unfolds on the battlefield but also on decisions made in the halls of power, from Washington to Moscow.
